Rohan Drape
2014-10-10 04:37:23 UTC
dear list,
could ClearBuf be made to copy it's input rather than write zero?
i think this'd just mean changing the first line of "void
ClearBuf_Ctor(ClearBuf *unit)" from:
OUT0(0) = 0.f;
to
OUT0(0) = ZIN0(0)
this'd make ClearBuf(LocalBuf(n)) work where at the moment we need to
write LocalBuf(n).clear
it's simpler (in some contexts) to have fewer "root" nodes in graphs
thanks,
rohan
ps. it line 785 of "server/plugins/DelayUGens.cpp"
_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list
info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
could ClearBuf be made to copy it's input rather than write zero?
i think this'd just mean changing the first line of "void
ClearBuf_Ctor(ClearBuf *unit)" from:
OUT0(0) = 0.f;
to
OUT0(0) = ZIN0(0)
this'd make ClearBuf(LocalBuf(n)) work where at the moment we need to
write LocalBuf(n).clear
it's simpler (in some contexts) to have fewer "root" nodes in graphs
thanks,
rohan
ps. it line 785 of "server/plugins/DelayUGens.cpp"
_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list
info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/